Showing 1072–1080 of 4929 resultsSorted by latest

• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Seneca Falls Convention Paper

  $25.00

  How and why Seneca Falls Convention came to be considered the Prominent Event that started Women’s Rights

  5 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Randomized Controlled Zinc Supplementation and HIV

  $20.00

  Students are to critically appraise (in an essay format) their selected article according to the following headings and sub-headings. Please note that the sections in italics are guidelines only and are not intended to be answered in a question answer format.

  TITLE PAGE (including name, student no, subject, class, lecturer, word count)

  INTRODUCTION (3 marks)

  Need to introduce your paper here with proper referencing (ie author and title). For Example: In this paper the article entitled “The therapeutic use of Drug X” by Smith et al., 2012 will be critically appraised. This article investigates…..

  Also need to discuss why you are conducting this assignment

  EVALUATION OF THE INTRODUCTION SECTION (6 marks)

  2.1 Literature review (3 marks) Consider:
  – Whether the author(s) literature search was adequate in terms of number, quality and relevance of references. 2.2 Aims or hypotheses (3 marks)

  Consider:

  • –  What was the question asked?
  • –  Was the question clearly stated?
  • –  Was the question focused in terms of the population, intervention and outcome?

  EVALUATION OF THE METHODS SECTION (20 marks)

  3.1 Subjects (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  Who were the participants?
  • –  If the participants were representative of the population under study.
  • –  How the participants were selected for inclusion in the study.
  • –  If the sample was adequately described.
  • –  If the sample size was appropriate and adequately representative of the target population.

  • –  If the sampling mode was appropriate.
  • –  If bias was evident in the selection of the participants.
  • –  If participant consent was obtained.

  3.2 Apparatus/instrumentation (2marks) Consider:

  ©Think: Colleges Pty Ltd Assessment-Page: 7

  • –  What type of instrumentation was used?
  • –  If the validity and reliability of the instrumentation was established. 3.3 Control group/s (3marks) Consider:
    • –  If there was a control group.
    • –  If the use/non use of a control group was consistent with the study strategy

  employed.

  • –  If the control was a placebo or alternative/normal treatment.
  • –  Was the control “treatment” adequately described?
  • –  If no control, why?
  • –  If there were ethical issues in using a control group.

  3.4 Subject assignment (3 marks) Consider:

  • –  How the participants were allocated to the treatment groups.
  • –  If the allocation was random.
  • –  Whether the method of allocation was adequately described.
  • –  If there were any differences between the groups at entry to the study reported.

  • –  If any differences reported might explain any outcome/s (confounding)

  3.5 Treatment parameters (3 marks) Consider:

  • –  If all treatments given were adequately described.
  • –  If the settings were adequately described.
  • –  If qualifications and/or training of administering personnel indicated.

  3.6 Rosenthal & Hawthorn effects? (4 marks) Consider:

  • –  What are these effects?
  • –  If the authors addressed these effects, and if so, how?

  4. EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS SECTION (Total 15 marks)

  4.1 Tables and graphs (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  If tables clearly identified.
  • –  If table headings were adequately described and any abbreviations clearly noted.

  • –  If the axis of graph were clearly identified.
  • –  If correlation used, was the data and/or correlation graph presented?

  4.2 Selection of statistics (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  If any assumptions were made about the population distribution, ie normal/non-normal.

  • –  If statistics used, which category, ie descriptive/inferential?
  • –  If statistics consistent with population distribution.
  • –  If an effect size was discussed.
  • –  If “numbers needed to treat” calculation done.
  • –  If confidence interval quoted. What is its significance?

  4.3 Interpretation of the findings (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  What were the study outcomes?
  • –  Were the authors findings supported by the results?
  • –  Did the authors make any inappropriate generalisations?

  ©Think: Colleges Pty Ltd Assessment-Page: 8

  • –  If clinical significance was discussed.
  • –  If the clinical significance would outweigh any statistical significance.

  5. CONCLUSION (6 marks)

  5.1 Internal validity (2 marks)
  – Overall appraisal of the internal validity the study. (Consider in the context of the criteria for internal validity) 5.2 External validity (2 marks)

  – Overall appraisal of the external validity of the study. (Consider in the context of the criteria for external validity)

  5.3 Overall Quality (2 marks)
  – Briefly discuss the overall quality of the article with reference to its strengths and weaknesses as outlined in the above sections.

  6. REFERENCES & Academic Writing (5 marks)

  Refer to Think Academic and Referencing Guidelines.

  **APPENDIX Include a clean copy of your selected paper here

  Students are to critically appraise (in an essay format) their selected article according to the following headings and sub-headings. Please note that the sections in italics are guidelines only and are not intended to be answered in a question answer format.

  TITLE PAGE (including name, student no, subject, class, lecturer, word count)

  INTRODUCTION (3 marks)

  Need to introduce your paper here with proper referencing (ie author and title). For Example: In this paper the article entitled “The therapeutic use of Drug X” by Smith et al., 2012 will be critically appraised. This article investigates…..

  Also need to discuss why you are conducting this assignment

  EVALUATION OF THE INTRODUCTION SECTION (6 marks)

  2.1 Literature review (3 marks) Consider:
  – Whether the author(s) literature search was adequate in terms of number, quality and relevance of references. 2.2 Aims or hypotheses (3 marks)

  Consider:

  • –  What was the question asked?
  • –  Was the question clearly stated?
  • –  Was the question focused in terms of the population, intervention and outcome?

  EVALUATION OF THE METHODS SECTION (20 marks)

  3.1 Subjects (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  Who were the participants?
  • –  If the participants were representative of the population under study.
  • –  How the participants were selected for inclusion in the study.
  • –  If the sample was adequately described.
  • –  If the sample size was appropriate and adequately representative of the

  target population.

  • –  If the sampling mode was appropriate.
  • –  If bias was evident in the selection of the participants.
  • –  If participant consent was obtained.

  3.2 Apparatus/instrumentation (2marks) Consider:

  ©Think: Colleges Pty Ltd Assessment-Page: 7

  • –  What type of instrumentation was used?
  • –  If the validity and reliability of the instrumentation was established. 3.3 Control group/s (3marks) Consider:
    • –  If there was a control group.
    • –  If the use/non use of a control group was consistent with the study strategy

  employed.

  • –  If the control was a placebo or alternative/normal treatment.
  • –  Was the control “treatment” adequately described?
  • –  If no control, why?
  • –  If there were ethical issues in using a control group.

  3.4 Subject assignment (3 marks) Consider:

  • –  How the participants were allocated to the treatment groups.
  • –  If the allocation was random.
  • –  Whether the method of allocation was adequately described.
  • –  If there were any differences between the groups at entry to the study

  reported.

  • –  If any differences reported might explain any outcome/s (confounding)

  3.5 Treatment parameters (3 marks) Consider:

  • –  If all treatments given were adequately described.
  • –  If the settings were adequately described.
  • –  If qualifications and/or training of administering personnel indicated.

  3.6 Rosenthal & Hawthorn effects? (4 marks) Consider:

  • –  What are these effects?
  • –  If the authors addressed these effects, and if so, how?

  4. EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS SECTION (Total 15 marks)

  4.1 Tables and graphs (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  If tables clearly identified.
  • –  If table headings were adequately described and any abbreviations clearly

  noted.

  • –  If the axis of graph were clearly identified.
  • –  If correlation used, was the data and/or correlation graph presented?

  4.2 Selection of statistics (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  If any assumptions were made about the population distribution, ie

  normal/non-normal.

  • –  If statistics used, which category, ie descriptive/inferential?
  • –  If statistics consistent with population distribution.
  • –  If an effect size was discussed.
  • –  If “numbers needed to treat” calculation done.
  • –  If confidence interval quoted. What is its significance?

  4.3 Interpretation of the findings (5 marks) Consider:

  • –  What were the study outcomes?
  • –  Were the authors findings supported by the results?
  • –  Did the authors make any inappropriate generalisations?

  ©Think: Colleges Pty Ltd Assessment-Page: 8

  • –  If clinical significance was discussed.
  • –  If the clinical significance would outweigh any statistical significance.

  5. CONCLUSION (6 marks)

  5.1 Internal validity (2 marks)
  – Overall appraisal of the internal validity the study. (Consider in the context of the criteria for internal validity) 5.2 External validity (2 marks)

  – Overall appraisal of the external validity of the study. (Consider in the context of the criteria for external validity)

  5.3 Overall Quality (2 marks)
  – Briefly discuss the overall quality of the article with reference to its strengths and weaknesses as outlined in the above sections.

  6. REFERENCES & Academic Writing (5 marks)

  Refer to Think Academic and Referencing Guidelines.

  **APPENDIX Include a clean copy of your selected paper here

  Additional Files:

  Randomized-Controlled-Clinical-Trial-of-Zinc.pdf
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  bus 325 Assignment 4: On-boarding

  $10.00

  Onboarding process outline

  In this assignment, you will create an outline of an onboarding process. Summarize what you feel are the 2 most important elements in onboarding in the global environment.

  Write a one to two (1-2) page paper in which you:

  1. Create an outline of an on-boarding process. Include a brief explanation of each step and explain why it is important.
  2. Summarize what you believe are the two (2) most critical elements to consider when on-boarding in the global environment.
  3. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
     a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
     b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

  The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze international business strategy to identify human resource requirements and formulate supporting HRM plans that can improve productivity and contribute to the firm’s competitiveness.
  • Select performance management processes to assess and improve performance throughout a multinational corporation.
  • Propose training programs to improve performance throughout a multinational corporation and address the considerations for effective learning in a diverse workforce of expatriates, host country nationals, and third-country nationals.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in global HRM. Write clearly and concisely about global HRM using proper writing mechanics.

  ---
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  BUS-325 Assignment 3 Recruiting: Japan

  $7.00

  Imagine you are presenting a new global recruiting strategy to your boss. Choose either Japan or Saudi Arabia, and research business strategies for recruiting in your chosen region. Identify the top three to five (3-5) factors that would need to be considered when recruiting in the country you chose. Close with a persuasive summary on why you believe these factors are important. Close with a persuasive summary that explains why these factors are important. Demonstrate your findings to your boss in the form of a PowerPoint presentation.

  Create a four to eight (4-8) slide PowerPoint in which you:

  1. Summarize your findings about recruiting in either Japan or Saudi Arabia.
  2. Identify the top three to five (3-5) factors that would need to be considered when recruiting in your chosen region.
  3. Develop a persuasive closing summary that describes why the factors you identified are important.
  4. Include links or references to one to three (1-3) quality resources based on your research. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.
  5. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

  a. Format the PowerPoint presentation with headings on each slide and one (1) relevant graphic (photograph, graph, clip art, etc.). Ensuring that the presentation is visually appealing and readable from up to 18 feet away. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  b. Include a title slide containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  BUS-325 Assignment 2 Expatriates (Memo)

  $5.00

  Assignment 2: Expatriates
  Imagine you are an HR manager, and you have been challenged with the task of reducing expatriate turnover. Think of one or two (1-2) strategies to accomplish this task, and write a one (1) page memo to your boss summarizing your ideas. Persuade him that this is the direction to go.

  Write a one (1) page memo in which you:
  Develop two (2) strategies that will help your company reduce expatriate turnover.
  Summarize both ideas in memo format to present to your boss.
  Create compelling arguments in favor of your solution to persuade your boss.
  Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

  a. Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with oneinch margins on all sides.

  b. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

  The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze international business strategy to identify human resource requirements and formulate supporting HRM plans that can improve productivity and contribute to the firm’s competitiveness.
  • Propose staffing alternatives for foreign operations and address the considerations for the use of expatriates versus localization or third-country nationals.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in global HRM.
  • Write clearly and concisely about global HRM using proper writing mechanics.

  See Also: BUS-325 Assignment 3 Recruiting: Japan
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  BUS-325 Assignment 1: Culture

  $7.00

  Merger integration plan

  You work for a company that has recently merged with an overseas company. I need assistance with writing a brief introduction to the company as well as the company that was purchased. Then develop an eight to ten (8-10) point checklist detailing what steps you would take as the HR manager to help unify the culture of both companies.

  Create two (2) company introductions and develop an eight to ten (8-10) point checklist in which you:
  1. Give a succinct overview of your fictitious company.
  2. Give a succinct overview of the fictitious company merged with.
  3. Develop an eight to ten (8-10) point checklist of steps you would take to unify company culture.
  4. Explain your rationale for choosing each of the steps in your checklist.
  5. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:

  See Also: BUS-325 Assignment 2 Expatriates (Memo)
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Roles and Contributions of Black Women Civil Rights Movement

  $21.00

  Roles and Contributions of Black Women Civil Rights Movement

  The Roles and Contributions of Black Women in the Civil Rights Movement

  Contents

  1. Introduction

  1.1 Research Question…

  2. Literature Review
  3. Analysis of the Roles and Contributions of Black Women

  3.1 Reasons …

  3.2 Functions and Significance

  4. Conclusion
  5. Further Study

  7 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Give an example of a meaningful use of Electronic Health Record

  $5.00

  Q1: Give an example of a meaningful use of Electronic Health Record. How can physicians and patients benefits from the electronic convergence of data?

  Q2. Consider what you know about the typical daily schedule of a busy clinician. What are the advantages of wireless devices, connected to the Internet, as tools for such clinicians? Can you think of disadvantages as well? Be sure to consider the safety and protection of information as well as workflow and clinical needs.

  Q3: What is the life-cycle of an analytics or data mining project?

  Q4. Why is data understanding important? Discuss some ways of doing data understanding.

  Q5. You check your pulse and discover that your heart rate is 100 beats per minute. Is this rate normal or abnormal? What additional information would you use in making the judgment? How does the context in which data are collected influence the interpretation?
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  BUS 499 WK 10 Assignment 5 – Walmart

  $20.00

  Select a publicly traded corporation for which you would like to work or are currently working.
  Research the corporation on its own Website, the public filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR database, in the University’s online databases, and any other sources you can find. The annual report will often provide insights that can help address some of these questions

  Write eight to ten (8-10) Pages paper in which you:
  1. Determine the impact of the company’s mission, vision, and primary stakeholders on its overall success.
  2. Analyze the five (5) forces of competition to determine how they impact the company.
  3. Create a SWOT analysis for the company to determine its major strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
  4. Based on the SWOT analysis, outline a strategy for the company to capitalize on its strengths and opportunities, and minimize its weaknesses and threats.
  5. Discuss the various levels and types of strategies the firm may use to maximize its competitiveness and profitability
  6. Outline a communications plan the company could use to make the strategies you recommend above known to all stakeholders.
  7. Select two (2) corporate governance mechanisms used by this corporation and evaluate how effective they are at controlling managerial actions.
  8. Evaluate the effectiveness of leadership within this corporation and make at least one (1) recommendation for improvement.
  9. Assess efforts by this corporation to be a responsible (ethical) corporate citizen and determine the impact these efforts (or lack thereof) have on the company’s bottom line. Provide specific examples to support your response.
  10. Use at least seven (7) quality references. Note:Wikipedia and other Websites do not quality as academic resources.

  Micro and macro analysis of the banking sector in Qatar