Browse Our Directory

Browse Our Directory

  • Paper discussing psychoneuroimmunology in general

    $17.50

    Prepare a brief paper discussing psychoneuroimmunology in general, and presenting at three new research reports published in peer reviewed journals in the past year that link life events to the immune system. Using the critiques of research found in the text, be sure to critique the research that you find.For this assignment, you will submit the complete paper, and summarize your findings and be able to present them as an entry to a blog. Length: 3-5 page paper

  • CAM is not a pseudoscience

    $7.00

    Prepare an article suitable for publication in a “letters to the editor” section of a print or online journal, rebutting the position in the National Science Foundation article (see “Science and Engineering Indicators 2002: Science and Technology: Science Fiction and Pseudoscience” in this week’s resources), that CAM is pseudoscience. Be sure to point out any logical fallacies in the article, and present research based evidence, using the material in the book as well as at least five research articles published in peer reviewed journals in the past three years to support your argument.
    WHY CAM IS NOT A PSEUDOSCIENCE!!! NOT SUPPORTING A PSEUDOSCIENCE!!!

  • Importance of Data Collection Methods

    $10.00

    Management research relies upon a variety of different data collection methods, such as survey, interview and observation. Different methods produce different types of data, each requiring different analytical approaches. Look to your text for explanations of the various methods you can use in your research and the types of analyses that can be used to make sense of the data you collect.
    In a 750-1,000 word response, post your answers to the following questions to the Discussion Board

    • How does the adoption of a particular methodology affect the researcher’s choice of methods for data collection and analysis?
    • Which methods might you choose, bearing in mind your chosen methodology and epistemological stance?
  • hat are the criteria (or standards) for a “good” website about ADD or ADHD

    $7.00

    4 DQ 1& 2

    Continuation of previous exercises on CDC website:
    http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html
    http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html

    In 100 to 200 words each

    (A)

    During Modules 4 and 5, you will complete a review of a website about ADD or ADHD. Thus, you’ll need to start this discussion with the following: What are the criteria (or standards) for a “good” website about ADD or ADHD? Early in your invention process, it is a great idea to list, define, and elaborate on as many criteria as you can. How would you define each criterion? Why is each one important? After you have listed criteria, come back later and respond to your classmates’ posts: Which criteria are the most important? The least important? Why do you think so?

    (B)

    After completing a Rhetorical analysis for the ADHD webpage, do you feel well versed on this topic? As you look for a website about ADD or ADHD to review for your next essay, think about what criteria or standards you might use to evaluate this website. What would make a good website about ADD or ADHD?

    (C)

    What website have you chosen for your review? Include a link in your message so that the other students can see your chosen site. How well does the website you have chosen live up to the criteria you chose earlier this week? Does it meet some criteria better than others? Explain your reasoning about how well your item matches each criterion you listed. During the week, look at your classmates’ websites and see if you agree with their assessment.

    (D)

    Read over the “Planning” section of Chapter 11 in the textbook. There, you will find advice for describing and evaluating your chosen website. Post a message in which you describe your Web site (at least one paragraph), and then offer some analysis (at least one more paragraph), as described in our textbook. During the week, respond to others’ description and evaluation paragraphs and explain what you think they did well. Also offer some advice for revision. You may also offer counterarguments by explaining how someone might disagree with their view.

  • Review of a website about ADHD/ADD

    $7.00

    Write a750-1,000-word review of a website about ADHD/ADD. The review will evaluate the website using a set of explicit criteria. Consider your audience to be the general public.

    Your review should include at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.

    This essay is NOT a review of a specific article on the Internet. It is also NOT a review of the CDC site from the rhetorical analysis assignment. Instead, you will choose a different site such as www.chadd.org, http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder/index.shtml, http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/adhd/DS00275, or http://www.webmd.com/add-adhd/default.htm.

    Directions

    1. Develop a set of criteria that the general public would see as acceptable for a website about diseases and disorders (like ADHD). To help you select criteria, please visit http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/webcrit.html where you will find a list of criteria commonly used to evaluate websites. Also, review the Discussion Questions for the week concerning the development of criteria for reviewing websites.
    2. Describe the website you have chosen.
    3. Focus the majority of the essay on explaining how the site does (or does not) meet the criteria you established above.

    Review Chapter 11 “Reviews”in The Call to Write, which includes sample reviews and advice on writing reviews.

    First Draft Grading

    • You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of your draft.
    • Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructor’s comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.

      Final Draft Grading

    The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.

    Sources

    • Include in-text citations and a References page in GCU Style for at least TWO scholarly sources outside of class texts.
    • These sources should be used to support any claims you make.
    • Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
    • Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.

      Format

      Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

  • Who is in charge when spine boarding an athlete and why

    $10.00

    Please visit the following website to view the You Tube video on the correct way to backboard an injured athlete.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCqtAQ6uslo

    Answer the following questions about the videos

    1. Who is in charge when spineboarding an athlete and why?

    2. List 3 tools that can be used to remove a helmet.

    3. Where do the assistants place their hands to perform a log role and why?

    4. If you were at the head, what commands would you provide to the assistants to perform a log roll? Please detail as if you were performing in real time.

    5. Bullet point at minimum 4 key factors that you feel are essential from each video

  • Hourly Rounding: Capstone Project

    $7.00

    1ST ASSINGMENT

    Develop a searchable question using the PICOT format. (The question is a single statement identifying the components of PICOT.)

    Refer to “Developing a Question” and “Topic 1: Checklist.”

    3 NRS 441v.v10.0RDeveloping a Question.docx 2 NRS 441v.11R.Module1_Checklist.doc

    2ND ASSIGNMENT

    Prepare for the capstone project by listening to the audio interview, “Capstone.”

    Preview and utilize “Topic 1 Checklist.” This resource will assist you in organizing your work and will provide additional information regarding the assignment.

    Consider the clinical environment in which you are currently working or have recently worked. Collaborate with a leader or educator in the clinical environment to identify a problem, issue, or educational deficit upon which to build a proposal for change.

    In a paper of no more than 800 words, describe the nature of the problem, issue, or educational deficit. Include the following in your discussion:

    1. The setting and/or context in which the problem, issue, or educational deficit can be observed.
    2. Detailed description of the problem, issue, or educational deficit.
    3. Impact of the problem, issue, or educational deficit on the work environment, the quality of care provided by staff, and patient outcomes.
    4. Gravity of the problem, issue, or educational deficit and its significance to nursing.
    5. Proposed solution to address the problem, issue, or educational deficit.

    Prepare for the capstone project by listening to the audio interview, “Capstone: Planning Your Project” located at http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs441v_capstone.php

    Review “Topic 1: Checklist.” This resource will assist you in organizing your work and will provide additional information regarding the assignment.

    Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    2 NRS 441v.11R.Module1_Checklist.doc

  • The Moral dilemma of U.S. immigration

    $17.50

    Research and present a 10-page, critical evaluation of a single issue. The topic will be Cosmopolitanism and how that theory fit to our current dilemmas in the U.S . points to point out advantages, disadvantages, effects ext.. the student’s Every requirement must be completed. Contemporary Political Issues is more about gathering credible evidence,determining what it means, and critically thinking about it as it is about defining and sorting political and historical concepts.

    Links: http://www.law.yale.edu/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/3._Abizadeh.pdf
    http://prezi.com/-srbfizd8wy4/the-moral-dilemma-of-us-immigration-policy-open-borders-v/
    http://www.publicreason.ro/articol/74

    Add current dilemma : this link http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/16/jose-antonio-vargas-border-crisis-politics-tragic-on-many-levelsandhttp://www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/jul/16/la-bestia-song-commissioned-us-border-control-stop-immigration

  • Why Don’t We Complain Vs. On Compassion

    $7.00

    Write an essay comparing William F. Buckley Jr William F. Buckley Jr.’s “Why Don’t We Complain?” and Barbara Ascher’s “On Compassion.” Compare the two essays in terms of the writing strategies that the authors use (e.g. inductive, deductive, etc.) as well as the different writing purposes that they accomplish in their writing.