Browse Our Directory

Browse Our Directory

  • Summary of the Bloodhound Project

    $17.50

    4 page writing assignment.
    Given:
    Run Profile,Rocket Start Time (s),Parachute Deployment Time (s) 1,8,45 2,12,45 3,16,45 4,8,50 5,12,50 6,16,50 7,8,55 8,12,55 9,16,55
    These are 9 run profiles.

    Run Profiles are controlled by the following parameters:

    • · Rocket start time
    • · Chute opening time

    The constraints on the World Speed Record attempt must all be satisfied:

    • · Must achieve 1000mph for a duration of at least 1 mile
    • · Total distance travelled must be less than 10 miles
    • · G-force experienced by Andy Green to be no more than 3.5G

    In the introduction, using the following link www.bloodhoundssc.com) write 2 pages that

    • · Gives a summary of the Bloodhound Project (look at www.bloodhoundssc.com)
    • · What are your suggestions for run profiles and why?
    • · Where is the world record attempt taking place?
    • · What parameters are you looking at (g-force, CO2 etc.)
    • · Why look at these parameters? Why are they important?

    Then write 2 more pages in the discussion discussing the following points:

    • · What is the effect of delaying the rocket start time and chute deployment time?
    • · Maximising chance of achieving 1000mph – What are your recommendations for rocket start time and parachute deployment time?
    • · Driver Safety in the Bloodhound SSC – what are the factors influencing driver safety?
    • · What is the environmental impact of the Bloodhound SSC?
  • Financial Incentive vs. Ethical Practices

    $2.50

    You are offered two jobs. one of these jobs pays double the other but you have some serious ethical concerns about the jobs. the lower paying job also appears to be more in line with what makes you happy. which do you choose and why? how do you balance the ethical concerns with the financial benefits?

  • Persuasive speech about teen pregnancy and how it affects the future of both the mother and child

    $15.00

    Persuasive speech about teen pregnancy and how it affects the future of both the mother and chilPersuasive speech: assignment requirements
    1. Target time: 9 minutes (usually around 4.5 pages)
    2. Subject matter: You must deliver a speech designed to persuade your audience for or against a question of policy. What defines a “question of policy” is explained in APS, Chapter 16. As also explained in the APS, you will have to establish the need, plan, and practicality of your position, using strong supporting evidence (Chapter 8) and cogent argumentation (Chapter 17). Recognize that in this speech you are acting as an advocate on behalf of the policy you propose.
    3. Sources: a minimum of six sources, at least two of which must be scholarly sources. You may use websites, but only one website may count toward the required four sources.
    You are not required to use a visual aid.
    4. Citing sources and bibliography: You must include a bibliography listing all sources referenced in your speech. Please follow one of the accepted in-text citation and bibliographic formats noted for the informative speech. Just as you did with the informative speech, remember that to “count as a source” you actually have to cite that source in-text and then also list it in the bibliography.
    5. Format and delivery: As you did in your informative speech, you should write your persuasive speech using a full-sentence prep outline. And, as with the informative speech, you are required to deliver your remarks extemporaneously using a non-full-sentence speaking outline.

  • MGT FOOD BROKERS FALL INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW

    $32.00

    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW

    COURSE Number BUSA 391

    You are the President, Sole Director and Sole Shareholder of MGT Food Brokers Inc. (“MGT”).   MGT is in the business of buying and selling Congealed food products on the international market. Generally, customers of MGT, either in Canada or elsewhere around the world, request that you source Congealed food products for them. You do this through your wide knowledge of Congealed food packaging companies around the world and by purchasing the required products for MGT’s account. MGT purchases the products and then resells them to its customer. MGT arranges for the products to be shipped directly to its customer.

    One of MGT’s deals just went sour. Here is the background: On May 15, 2014 you received a telephone call from a company base in California USA known as HypoAllergenic Foods Products Inc. (“HypoAllergenic”). HypoAllergenic specializes in selling foods, which are guaranteed not to have traces of peanuts, insecticides or other substances, which are known to cause allergic reactions. HypoAllergenic has ordered from you for delivery to them twenty-five (25) containers of Congealed carrots. Deliveries are to be made to HypoAllergenic’s plant facility in Los Angeles, California. HypoAllergenic has requested one (1) container to be delivered on the last day of each month for twenty-five (25) months commencing September 30, 2014. The price agreed to per container is US$150,000.00. An essential condition of the transaction is that the carrots be free of any traces of peanuts or pesticides. If there are any traces MGT agrees in writing with HypoAllergenic that HypoAllergenic could immediately cancel the contract with MGT.

    Upon receipt of the order MGT immediately contacted Congealed Vegetables Limited. (“Congealed Vegetables”), a Congealed food wholesaler operating out of England, but selling vegetables from farms around the world, and negotiated to purchase from them the required quantities of Congealed carrots for a price per container of US$100,000.00 DDP Los Angeles, California. The only pertinent terms and conditions of the written agreement between MGT and Congealed Vegetables are:

    • By no later than July 1, 2014 a letter of credit, in favour of Congealed Vegetables, having the following provisions, will be issued by MGT’s banker, National Bank, Main Branch, Montreal Quebec:
    1. the letter of credit will be for a total amount of US$2,500,000.00;
    1. the letter of credit will be irrevocable;
    1. the letter of credit will permit twenty-five (25) monthly draws, commencing in the month of October, 2014 of US$100,000.00 each provided that in each instance the following documents are delivered to the nominated bank no later than the 23rd day of the month:
    • a duplicate original of onboard clean marine bill of lading relating to that month’s shipment; and
    • an attestation by the carrier that delivery of the container of Congealed carrots had been made to HypoAllergenic on the 1st day of the current month.
    1. Each draw is payable on the 23rd of each calendar month commencing October 23rd, 2014.
    • An arbitration clause, which reads as follows:

    “All disputes arising out of work in connection with the present contract shall be subject to arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce by 3 arbitrators appointed in accordance with the said Rules. The said arbitration shall be conducted in English in the Churchill Hotel, London, England.”

    • This contract shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with the laws of Quebec, Canada. For greater certainty, the CISG will apply.

    On June 30, 2014 MGT arranged for the requisite letter of credit to be issued by the National Bank to Congealed Vegetables. In order to persuade the National Bank to issue the letter of credit MGT had to put up security of CDN$150,000.00. As MGT and you personally were already tapped out, unknown to your spouse, you persuaded your mother-in-law to put up, as security, her last CDN$150,000.00, which she kept in cash in her mattress.

    On October 1, 2014 HypoAllergenic advised MGT that the first container of Congealed carrots had arrived on September 30, 2014 as required. HypoAllergenic indicated to MGT that it would start to process the Congealed carrots and would be paying for the first container load of carrots by electronic transfer to MGT’s bank account on October 22, 2014

    On Friday, October 10, 2014, National Bank telephoned you to tell you that the nominated bank in England had received all of the documents from Congealed Vegetables and that consequently the National Bank intended to pay Congealed Vegetables, via the nominated bank on October 23, 2014. You assured MGT’s account manager that the requisite US$100,000.00 to cover the letter of credit would in fact be in MGT’s bank account no later than the close of business October 22, 2014. He told you that if it was not, the bank would take your mother-in-law’s $150,000.00 which she put as guarantee.

    Today, October 22, 2014 you felt like you were the Thanksgiving Day turkey being carved up for dinner. MGT has just received a written notice from HypoAllergenic advising you that it has discovered traces of peanuts in the Congealed carrots and therefore has decided to:

    1. Reject the first container of goods;
    2. Not make the payment as promised on October 22, 2014; and
    3. Cancel the balance of the contract.

    After a few telephone calls you have been given to understand the source of the problem. Congealed Vegetables obtained the first shipment of carrots from organic growers. However, because the organic growers did not use pesticides they frequently rotated their crops. As a result, some of the carrots that were shipped to HypoAllergenic were from fields where peanuts had been grown in the previous season.

    In order to get your thoughts together on how to deal with this problem, and before calling you advisors, such as your lawyer, you have decided to put together a memorandum in the form of a term paper of approximately 3000 words dealing with the following issues:

    1. What could you have done to avoid getting into this mess?
    1. Now that you are in this mess, what strategy would you adopt include in your discussion:
    • indicate any alternatives which you have considered and rejected, explaining why you have rejected them; and
    • your evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the strategy that you have chosen as well as the likelihood of success.
  • “I Didn’t Type This Article,” by Will Oremus Response

    $7.00

    The Assignment:
    You will write a 2-page essay in which you give your response to the article, “I Didn’t Type This Article,” byWill Oremus.
    http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2014/04/the_end_of_typing_speech_recognition_technology_is_getting_better_and_better.html

    You will paraphrase, summarize, and quote the author of this article in your response in MLAformat as we have discussed in class. Your response paper should be persuasive as you argue whether or notyou agree or disagree with the author.

    Assignment Guidelines:
    You must have an effective introduction that gains the readers’ interest?You must use topic sentences and your paragraphs must be well organized?Transitions between ideas to show similarities and differences must be used regularly
    You must use at least 1 direct quotation in MLA format
    You must summarize and paraphrase the author throughout your essay
    Assignment Outline:

    1. Your introduction should provide a very brief summary of the entire article (X argues that ___) and endwith a thesis statement that states your reaction and thethree reasons why you agree or disagree
    2. Your body paragraphs (three of them) will each explain one of the reasons why you agree or disagreea.If you agree with something, for example, you would have a topic sentence that states what youagree with and then explainwhy you agree with it in the paragraph—either citing or paraphrasing
      the author as you do this.
    3. You will then have one counterargument paragraph
      a.If you agreed with the author, what is one point you disagree with?b.If you disagreed with the author, what is one point you can admit might be true?
    4. Finally, you will write a concluding paragraph that restates your thesis statement and highlights the threekey reasons you are right. You may want to close with a sentence that reminds us of why the issue isimportant to consider.

    Other Requirements:
    Must be 2 double-spaced pages in length (3 pages at most)?Must be double-spaced and in MLA format with 12pt Times New Roman font

  • Relative merits of China emphasizing coal in their electric generation planning

    $10.00

    Consider the relative merits of China emphasising coal in their electric generation planning. In your discussion posting, consider the following aspects:

    1. Are there better options for them? Why or why not?
    2. Could China rely exclusively on coal for power generation? Why or why not?

    Referencing styles as below should be within and after the writeup

    References within the paper: (For example: Kerzner (2010, p.465) is resolute in stating that there is a relationship between project management and Six Sigma.)

    List of references at the end of the paper: An example of a proper reference:

    Kerzner, H. (2010). Project Mnagement Best Practices: Achieving Global Excellence, 2nd edn John Wile & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ.

  • The Ensign Amendment was passed in 1997

    $7.00

    The Ensign Amendment was passed in 1997, as Pub. L. No. 104-208 sec. 614. The Act prohibits the use of federal funds to pay for the distribution of material that is sexually explicit or features nudity. Explain the impact of the Ensign Amendment on publications such as sports publications, educational publications, or entertainment publications.

    Assignment Guidelines:

    • Using the course materials, textbook, and Web resources, research the Ensign Amendment and prisoners’ rights with regard to the distribution of publications.
    • In a Word document of 2–3 pages, address the following:
      • Select 3 specific publications, and explain whether they would be acceptable under the Ensign Amendment.
    • For each selected publication, answer the following:
      • Do you believe that the publication can be distributed to prisoners using federal funds?
        • Why or why not?
      • Reference the Ensign Amendment to support your arguments.
      • Do you agree with the provisions of the Ensign Amendment? Explain
  • Classical and positivist approaches to punishment

    $12.00

    Classical and positivist approaches to punishment

    The classical view of punishment was fueled by the notion that offenders were evil men and women who had to be punished severely or killed for their egregious acts. It was felt that the demons that possessed the offenders would never leave except by expiation and punishment.

    As the influence of natural and social science grew, many individuals began to reexamine the widely accepted idea that crime resulted from demonic possession, free will, or mental imbalance. Positivists took a progressive stance and began to analyze the causes of crime and punishment.

    Prepare an essay (3–4 pages) on the differences between the classical and positivist approaches to punishment.

    Assignment Guidelines:

    • Use your course materials, the textbook, the Web resources, and the library to research the classical and positivist approaches to punishment.
    • In a Word document of 3–4 pages, address the following:
      • Identify 2 specific differences and 2 similarities between each perspective as it relates to punishment.
      • Examine 2 of the social arguments used to support both schools of thought.
      • Out of the 2 schools of thought, which do you agree with most?
      • Include 3 philosophical or social issues that could be used to support either model.
    • Reference all sources using APA
  • Compare and Contrast the Giver book and film

    $15.00

    ENGL 151: Advanced Reading Comprehension

    Compare and Contrast the Giver book and film

    the Giver by Lois Lowry and the movie directed by Phillip Noyce

    the giver’s world is a utopian one where there is no pain and peace prevails. However, as the protagonist, Jonas, gains knowledge about his inner workings of his community, he discovers his world is really a dystopian one.

    The film, The Giver contains similarities as well as many differences. Having read the book and watched the film, please answer the following questions:

    1. compare and contrast the similar ideas behind the book and the film (5 points)
    2. compare and contrast the plot in the book and the film (5 points)
    1. discuss the issues of class structure, conformity, governmental control in both the book and the film (5 points)
    2. describe what makes a perfect and imperfect society in both the book and the film (5 points)
    3. make text-to-film, text-to-self, and text-to-world connections (5 points)
    4. use texts in cross-curricular activities with history, especially in studying class structures and types of government (5 points)
    5. discuss how the following is portrayed in both the book and the film: (10 points)
    • Sameness
    • Color
    • Feelings, emotions
    • Music
    • Diversity
    • age
    • The Importance of memory
    • The Importance of the Individual
    • The Relationship Between Pain and Pleasure
    • Rules
    1. compare and contrast the ending of both the book and the film (5 points)
    2. if you were the director of the film, what would you have done differently? (5 points)

    Format of the reading project:

    1. Word count of 1000 words
    2. Academic Honesty (please read section on pilgrims on syllabus)
    3. Each typed project should include these elements:
    • Cover page with full name, ID #, course info (Section number), instructor’s name and etc.
    • the date you are turning in the report
    • an intriguing title for each report, centered above the text of your paper
    • word count
    • double spaced with 1 inch margins, 12 point standard serif fosuch as Times; please do not use a sans serif font like Arial or Helvetica)
    1. your paper should be proofread and revised before final submittal.