Showing 226–234 of 416 results

• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Explain how Fitzgerald presents marriage as a dysfunctional institution

  $15.00

  Marriage in The Great Gatsby

  Explain how Fitzgerald presents marriage as a dysfunctional institution in ‘The Great Gatsby.’ with reference to Richard Yates’ ‘Revolutionary Road.’

  7 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  The Great Gatsby: Symbolism in The Great Gatsby

  $3.50

  In Francis Fitzgerald’s uses symbols in The Great Gatsby to develop the characters of Jay Gatsby and George. This essay analyze how symbolism is used in the book to develop their characters

  3 pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Fitzgerald’s use of diction in The Great Gatsby

  $5.00

  The Great Gatsby- Diction and Selection of Detail

   F. Scott Fitzgerald uses specific choice of words and details in The Great Gatsby to develop the characters of Tom Buchanan and Myrtle Wilson. This paper cites specific examples that correspond to the use of diction and details in the Great Gatsby.

  3 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Expansive rhetorical analysis of “For the Win”

  $15.00

  The Hope of the Future

  The course text is “For the Win” by Cory Doctorow.

  Purpose
  To produce a thesis-driven analysis, complemented by secondary sources, of the rhetorical work undertaken by a particular text. (Whereas in the CRRP you focused on genre as a rhetorical strategy, in the RA you should consider other characteristics of the text and the rhetorical work that they do to achieve a specific purpose for a specific audience.)

  Assignment
  Building on what you learned through the Critical Reading Response Paper, you will now write a more expansive rhetorical analysis of our primary course text, For the Win. Your essay may still consider genre, but it should expand that discussion significantly beyond the CRRP. Your analysis should also address other rhetorical strategies the author employs and their relationship to the text’s rhetorical situation (context, purpose, audience, etc.).

  Including secondary sources in your RA paper will strengthen your argument and deepen your analysis in the context of academic discourse. Be mindful of how you can weave relevant and credible sources smoothly into your argument so that it exists as part of an ongoing dialogue among multiple parties involving the text being analyzed.

  (Pro Tip: Look back at your course texts, your annotations, records of class discussions, your Taking Notice chart, and the Reading Tweets you and your classmates have contributed to help you get started.)

  Requirements
  A successful essay of this sort will likely require 4-7 pages of recorded brain work.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  English 102 Essay

  $27.50

  Argument Synthesis On Academic Dishonesty

  7 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Q – Will there ever be a cashless society?

  $15.00

  Will there ever be a cashless society? What are the pros and cons of replacing cash with some sort of electronic payments mechanisms?

  3 Pages, 5 Posts
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  ENG 221 Week 4 User Manual (iJoy-175 Massage Chair)

  $7.50

  Critique English – General English

  Write a 2- to 3-page critique of an online user manual. You may download manuals for various products from http://www.safemanuals.com/ or other websites of your choice. Include the manual link in your submission. Identify and describe the criteria you used to critique the selected manual. Provide at least five criteria. Provide positive and negative examples from the online manual that represent each aspect of your designated criteria. Format your critique consistent with APA guidelines.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Compare “Batman Returns” and “Thelma and Louise”

  $32.50

  “Batman Returns” Vs. “Thelma and Louise”

  Using Jung’s notion of archetypes and/or Joseph Campbell’s notion of a mystic journey analyze and compare two of the following films: “Batman Returns” and “Thelma and Louise”

  8 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Discussion Against Fracking

  $5.00

  Discussion: Fracking

  A controversial issue in the news around the US and the world is the technique of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas, or “fracking”. Fracking involves injecting water, sand, and chemicals deep under ground at high pressures to explode, or fracture, shale layers, thereby releasing and forcing natural gas/oil deposits up the drilled well back to the surface.

  Proponents claim that fracking has been done safely in some form for about 60 years, supplies us with much needed energy, reduces our dependence on foreign energy sources, provides much needed jobs and economic benefits to local and regional economies, and has not been proven unsafe by any government agency.

  Opponents claim that fracking fluid contains toxics such as benzene and arsenic which can be released during fracking and related activities, polluting the air, water, and soil, negatively impacting the health of those close to well sites, and lowering property values. Fracking also releases large amounts of climate changing methane, far more potent than CO2. They further claim that the oil and gas industry uses its wealth and political connections to stifle debate, research, protective legislation, and our green energy future.

  What do you think? Please research fracking, arrive at an informed, researched opinion, and make substantive posts in the discussion area, citing your sources.