Healthcare and Life Sciences
Showing 343–351 of 732 results
-
HLT-362V: Applied Statistics Health Care Lecture – Topic 2 DQ1
$5.00Topic 2 DQ1: Explain each sampling technique discussed in the “Visual Learner: Statistics” in your own words, and give examples of when each technique would be appropriate
HLT-362V: Applied Statistics Health Care Lecture – Topic DQ2
$5.00Topic 1 DQ 2: What are the characteristics of a population for which it would be appropriate to use mean/median/mode? When would the characteristics of a population make them inappropriate to use?
Textbook: Grove, S. K. (2007). Statistics for health care research: A practical workbook. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders.
HLT-362V: Applied Statistics Health Care Lecture – Topic 1 DQ
$5.00Topic 1 DQ 1: How can graphics and/or statistics be used to misrepresent data? Where have you seen this done?
Textbook: Grove, S. K. (2007). Statistics for health care research: A practical workbook. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders.
Theology of Suffering and disaster response (Outline)
$5.00Without ones’ own understanding of the purpose of suffering, crisis responders cannot truly offer emotional and spiritual care in disasters and provide comfort and direction to others in their suffering and pain. With this thought in mind, compile an original paper of 8–10 pages of body text, in APA style, that begins by explaining your own personal theology of suffering. Use commentary and biblical references to support your position. In addition, explain how you would consult with a congregation to set up a plan of preparation for pre-incidence disasters. Utilizing information presented in your texts as well as theoretical and practical elements from academic and Christian sources, describe how you would foster resiliency in the pastor and the congregation.
A minimum of 10 scholarly sources (books and journal articles) is required in addition to your textbooks (if you choose to cite these). Grades will be assigned based on quality of content, how well APA guidelines are adhered to, the richness of citations utilized, quality of expression, and biblical integration presented.
Alzheimer’s Commercial (draft)
$5.00Rhetorical situation: You work at an advertising agency that specializes in creating commercials. The Alzheimer’s Association has asked you to create a new web commercial. It wants to attract a new audience with its web commercial. Your job is to examine its previous commercials and come up with a new commercial that will help the organization attract a new audience.
- Step 1: Examine the previous web commercials. Do a rhetorical analysis of the commercials, just as you did with the music video. Who do you think the audiences are for the commercials?
- Step 2: Examine the potential audiences they could attract that the Alzheimer’s Association are not attracting.
- Step 3: Examine what new information you would highlight.
- Step 4: Write a speech highlighting the following: the audiences of the previous web commercials; the new commercial you will make; the audience you would attract with the commercial; how the new commercial would benefit the organization. You may also highlight other relevant issues.
Please note that you will keep the same “type” of web commercial the Alzheimer’s Association uses.
Speech is characterized by the following:- Double-spaced with at least 550 words
- Discussion of previous commercials and the audiences the commercials attracted
- Discussion of new commercial and the new audience it will attract
- Discussion of how the commercial will help the organization
- Discussion of the research you found that highlights the fact
SIGNIFICANCE OF HOURLY ROUNDING IN HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES
$30.00Combine all elements completed in previous weeks (Topics 1-4) into one cohesive evidence-based proposal and share the proposal with a leader in your organization. (Appropriate individuals include unit managers, department directors, clinical supervisors, charge nurses, and clinical educators.)
Obtain feedback from the leader you have selected and request verification using the Capstone Review Form. Submit the signed Capstone Review Form to CONHCPfield@gcu.edu
For information on how to complete the assignment, refer to “Writing Guidelines” and “Exemplar of Evidence-Based Practice.”
Include a title page, abstract, problem statement, conclusion, reference section, and appendices (if tables, graphs, surveys, diagrams, etc. are created from tools required in Topic 4).
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
PLEASE NOTE THIS: GRADING RUBIC.
1).Abstract meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
2).Problem description meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
3).Solution description meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
4).Implementation plan meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
5).Evaluation plan meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
6).Dissemination plan meets all criteria of writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection.
7).Thesis/ main claim is comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8).Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
9).In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Paper discussing psychoneuroimmunology in general
$17.50Prepare a brief paper discussing psychoneuroimmunology in general, and presenting at three new research reports published in peer reviewed journals in the past year that link life events to the immune system. Using the critiques of research found in the text, be sure to critique the research that you find.For this assignment, you will submit the complete paper, and summarize your findings and be able to present them as an entry to a blog. Length: 3-5 page paper
CAM is not a pseudoscience
$7.00Prepare an article suitable for publication in a “letters to the editor” section of a print or online journal, rebutting the position in the National Science Foundation article (see “Science and Engineering Indicators 2002: Science and Technology: Science Fiction and Pseudoscience” in this week’s resources), that CAM is pseudoscience. Be sure to point out any logical fallacies in the article, and present research based evidence, using the material in the book as well as at least five research articles published in peer reviewed journals in the past three years to support your argument.
WHY CAM IS NOT A PSEUDOSCIENCE!!! NOT SUPPORTING A PSEUDOSCIENCE!!!hat are the criteria (or standards) for a “good” website about ADD or ADHD
$7.004 DQ 1& 2
Continuation of previous exercises on CDC website:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.html
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/adhd/facts.htmlIn 100 to 200 words each
(A)
During Modules 4 and 5, you will complete a review of a website about ADD or ADHD. Thus, you’ll need to start this discussion with the following: What are the criteria (or standards) for a “good” website about ADD or ADHD? Early in your invention process, it is a great idea to list, define, and elaborate on as many criteria as you can. How would you define each criterion? Why is each one important? After you have listed criteria, come back later and respond to your classmates’ posts: Which criteria are the most important? The least important? Why do you think so?
(B)
After completing a Rhetorical analysis for the ADHD webpage, do you feel well versed on this topic? As you look for a website about ADD or ADHD to review for your next essay, think about what criteria or standards you might use to evaluate this website. What would make a good website about ADD or ADHD?
(C)
What website have you chosen for your review? Include a link in your message so that the other students can see your chosen site. How well does the website you have chosen live up to the criteria you chose earlier this week? Does it meet some criteria better than others? Explain your reasoning about how well your item matches each criterion you listed. During the week, look at your classmates’ websites and see if you agree with their assessment.
(D)
Read over the “Planning” section of Chapter 11 in the textbook. There, you will find advice for describing and evaluating your chosen website. Post a message in which you describe your Web site (at least one paragraph), and then offer some analysis (at least one more paragraph), as described in our textbook. During the week, respond to others’ description and evaluation paragraphs and explain what you think they did well. Also offer some advice for revision. You may also offer counterarguments by explaining how someone might disagree with their view.
