Religion and Sociology
Showing 127–135 of 372 results
-
MARRIAGE IN SPAIN, INDIA AND CHINA
$37.50Comparison between Indian Spanish and Chinese marriage
Pages: 12, double spaced
Citation: APA
Compare Your Home Culture (Arabic) and Contrast it to the U.S.
$25.00Since all of you are international students, you have already experienced Intercultural Communication.
Drawing on Chapter 6 specifically, and the text in general, compare your home culture (identifying the cultural patterns from Ch. 6) and contrast it to the U.S. on at least 4 specific communication factors. This can include verbal, nonverbal, values, power distance, or any other factor.
Support your claims with examples of typical behaviors from both cultures. The length depends entirely on your ability to describe communication behaviors . You may find that your own period of adjustment may guide you.
Pages: 5, double spaced
TRS100: Theological Inquiry Assignment
$25.00The purpose of this guide is to help you focus on key points we have studied. Seek to understand the terms and the issues behind the short answer questions. Most questions are taken from the Mueller text. Do not simply memorize. Note that when you are given such a specific and limited set of terms and questions, you are expected to write clearly, support your ideas with specifics and show your aptitude for critical thinking. In other words, be sure you really understanding the issues treated in the text.
Theological Terms: Define or identify the following terms. Be able to explain what the term refers to and why it is significant.
Jesus as Messiah, Fall of Jerusalem, Kingdom of God, Parable, Samaritans, Sermon on the Mount, Beatitude, antithesis, ecumenical council, Arius, Council of Nicea, homoousios,Arius, Council of Chalcedon (teaching on divine and human natures in Christ), creed, Greek Orthodox, Martin Luther, Salvation by faith alone and Scripture alone; John Calvin, predestination,Short Answer Questions (a well developed paragraph) The questions below are meant to guide you in understanding major concepts. The actual questions on the exam may differ.
- Mark’s gospel portrays Jesus as a “suffering Messiah.” Explain this term, showing how Mark both builds upon and differs from the Jewish understanding of Messiah.
- Describe the distinctive elements of the Roman Catholic hierarchy. How do Roman Catholics understand the relation of the papacy to Peter?
- Summarize Martin Luther’s Understanding of justification by faith.
- What is meant by the term Social Justice? See Mueller, chapter 8.
- What is meant by Catholic social teaching
- What is the definition of the word church (See Mueller)
- Protestantism, Evangelicalism, Lutheranism arose at particular times-i.e., the sixteenth, eighteenth, and twentieth centuries-in relation to certain situations that existed at these times. Summarize the historical factors that contributed to the emergence of ONE of these movements
- Explain the understanding of social just within Judaism or Islam.
There will be a question asking for personal reflection.
Similarities and Differences between the Religions of the World
$37.50Your paper must analyze your chosen topic, and you must use references to support your analysis, including references from class readings (e.g., our class books) as well as references from other readings done outside of class (e.g., books/articles you found that are related to your research topic).
When writing, follow these guidelines:
Content: In all your papers, make sure you compose clear and comprehensible statements. For your research paper, make sure that there is an overarching theme, position, or argument that your paper is expressing. Your research paper must include some class readings as well as materials from outside of class (e.g., books, articles). Websites are acceptable references, but your bibliography should not be composed of mostly or entirely websites. Whether using few sources or many, you should express a thorough and critical engagement with your research materials. Relevance: Papers must explicitly address themes or topics relevant to class.
Mechanics: Make sure to use correct spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
Paper length: Your fieldwork paper should be 5-6 pages (around 1600 words). Your research paper should be 8-10 pages (around 2500 words). All papers should be double spaced. No cover page is needed.
Formatting: Papers should include your name, class name, title of paper, indented paragraphs for the body of the paper, footnotes or parenthetical citations (with page numbers) for any quotations or references used, and a works cited page that includes the bibliographic information for all sources used. When citing reference materials, you can use MLA, APA style guidelines, the Chicago Manual of Style, or any other format. The important thing is to be consistent and convey enough information to show the source of your quotations and references.
Resiliency and Spirituality Due to Trauma in Military Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
$42.50MILT 525: RESEARCH PAPER – Resiliency and Spirituality Due to Trauma in Military Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Research Paper Instructions
Utilizing information presented in your texts as well as theoretical and practical elements from academic and Christian sources, compile an original paper of 12–15 pages including title page, abstract, body and references, in APA style. It should summarize your understanding of resilience and spirituality in general, or resilience and spirituality shown in relationship to one or more major phases of the Resilience Life Cycle™. Address factors relevant to success in the phase(s) under consideration, and spiritual and professional approaches to resilience. A minimum of 10 scholarly sources (books and journal articles) is required in addition to your textbooks (if you choose to cite these). Grades will be assigned based on quality of content, how well APA guidelines are adhered to, the richness of citations utilized, quality of expression, and biblical integration presented. Please see the grading rubric for additional information.
- Length of paper: 12–15 pages—Points off if the paper is below 12 pages or exceeds 15 pages. (Including title page, abstract and references.)
- Include at least 10 current references (within the last 8 years)—points deducted for each missing or out-of-date reference.
- Follow APA 6th style. Review the APA Grading Rubric for guidance regarding grading factors, and, for additional aid, research the Purdue Online Writing Lab at http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/
- Paper will be graded on thoroughness, content, and use of theoretical material and integration of biblical perspective.
- Avoid Plagiarism—Using or passing off someone else’s work as your own is a serious academic offense. Papers are submitted through SafeAssign to check for the proper treatment of sources. You may submit a draft version to the “Research Paper [DRAFT]” SafeAssignment link to check your score, then edit and revise, and submit it to the “Research Paper” SafeAssignment link.
- Plagiarizing your paper will result minimally in failure of the assignment. Plagiarizing can also result in automatic failure of the course and academic discipline. Please make sure that all work is your own or is cited appropriately.
ISLAM RELIGION
$3.00Listen to the record and choose three of the following and apply it in one paper.
*1. History of the group
*2. Values and beliefs
*3. Roles for different people.
*4. Rules for different people.
*5. Ways of showing approval and disapproval.
*6. Meaningful artifacts.
Pages: 1, double spaced
Theory of Equity Application in Marriage
$35.007 pages of applying communication theory to phenomena .
The scenario can be from book, media, or even real life
Final Paper Assignment: Students will select one or more communication theories and apply the theory to a specific communication phenomenon. The theory will be used to explain the human interaction or phenomenon under examination in the paper. The paper will be 7 to 10 pages in length and will follow the standards for writing a research paper as stated in APA style manual.
The introductory paragraph will start with a problem (or a human communication problem) and the paper will evolve from there by focusing on the nature of the problem as it relates to human interaction. Next the theory to be applied to the scenario with a problem embedded in it will be summarized with the inclusion of some background on the theory. Next the human interaction or scenario to be examined through the lens of the selected theory is summarized. Finally, the theory is applied to the scenario with a discussion of what the theory predict will happen, occur, appear, and result.
Cite the sources of all information used to support the opinions, findings, explanations, and discussions linked to this assignment. When citing research use APA rules.
Add Me on Facebook? How Long-Distance Couples Maintain Open Communication Through Mediate Forms of Social Media
$65.00SUGGESTED OUTLINE FOR THE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REPORT
A research report should convince the reader of the significance, soundness, and thoroughness of the study. It should describe the research questions posed, the conceptual framework used or developed, the foundational literature(s) and related research traditions, the overall approach to the study, the methods of data gathering and analysis, how the researcher ensure the study’s trustworthiness, ways that participants collaborate in the research process, and the tentative conclusions or “lessons learned.” The methods used in the conduct of the study should be described fully, including any interview protocols or observation schedules used. There should be a detailed discussion of the role of the researcher during the conduct of the study as well as the natural history of the inquiry. The conclusions may be presented in any one of a number of ways: thematically, historically/ chronologically, or ideographically, for example. Finally, the report should indicate how the study will contribute to theory, to policy, to practice, and (perhaps) to methodology. The report should be no more than 25-30 pages long and should be carefully proofread for content, organization, logical development, and mechanics.
- Introduction – 1-2 pp.
Summarize the study. Write this section after you have written the others.
- The Research Topic – 3-5 pp.
Describe the problem or topic the study has investigated the research questions are posed and previous research in this area is discussed. (Review of Literature).
Describe the theoretical framework guiding the study, if you are using one. This too may be related to previous research or compared to illustrate the lack of study in this manner or perspective.
Discuss how the study is a specific investigation of a more general phenomenon. Link it to a social science discipline, if appropriate.
Briefly discuss your thinking on the topic. If you are already familiar with it, briefly discuss the research literature on the topic. There is no need to review additional literature for this section. Include what you know or your thinking about the topic.
Discuss why this topic has significance for education (formal or non-formal), pressing social problems, policy issues, the participants, or yourself. Why do we need to learn more about this topic? This is the “so what” question.
- Research Design and Methods – 10-12 pp.
Please note that this section is the most important for the purposes of the course. If it is not thoroughly and competently done, the rest of the paper suffers.
This section details the conduct of the study. Since this is a research course, this section is the place where you demonstrate at lease a rudimentary mastery of the knowledge and skills of the course.
Describe the overall approach to data collection: case study, ethnography, for example. Discuss how the approach emerged, or if you already had it in mind when you began the study. Discuss your design decisions using the methodological literature.
Describe the population of interest. Examples include elementary special needs classrooms, groups of religious women, bereaved mothers, Carnegie schools, cooperative work organizations.
Describe the particular setting or sample of people selected. Discuss your preliminary thinking about the selections, how this changed over time, and what prompted those changes. Discuss what you might go in a subsequent study. Use the methodological literature to discuss your decisions.
Describe the ways you gathered data. Be specific about how often, where, when, with whom; numbers of field notes generated or interviews conducted or observations made, this should also include a discussion of the types of data generated: interview transcriptions, observational records documents, videos filmed, artifacts collected. Discuss the sampling decisions that led you to collect these data rather than some other set. Discuss how the participants collaborated in gathering data, if such was the case.
Describe the processes of data analysis. Theme development, typologies generated, emergent insights. Use of analytic memos, coding schemes, graphic representations of data. Discuss how the participants’ insights were sought and incorporated. Use the methodological literature to discuss your choice of methods and processes of data analysis.
Discuss what you did to try to be sure that the study was well thought-out, ethical, and sturdy, given its small scale. Examples include use of a critical friend, sharing with participants, triangulation of methods or sources. What might you do in a designing a longer-term study?
Discuss your role as you conducted the study. Provide vignettes from your personal journal reflecting emerging insights or crises. Discuss any specific role dilemmas that emerged. Use the methodological literature t discus your points.
Point a natural history of the study. Discuss how your conception of the phenomenon of interest changed over the course of the study; design decisions revised; new twists in data gathering. Try to be comfortable discussing the messiness of inquiry and how the serendipitous can have profound influence on our thinking.
- Findings – 7-9 pp.
Describe the major conclusions or “lessons learned” from the study.
Use categories to organize the data: themes, historical periods, type of individual, critical incidents. No one way is the best; it depends on the data and how you choose to interpret and present them. Develop each category using assertions and then direct quotes or narrative summaries to support each point. This is critical: even though this is a small-scale study and your conclusions are tentative and preliminary, you should convince the reader of their soundness. Build a chain of a logic or evidence ti support the conclusions and interpretations you have come to.
Suggestion: it is better to present and develop fully a portion of the findings (i.e., one category or theme) than to skim over the surface of all the data without development.
- Significance and Implications – 2 pp.
Discuss how the learnings might relate to theoretical ideas or related literature. Restate the specific focus of the study.
Discuss how this small-scale study or a more elaborated study on this topic might contribute to research, policy, and practice; it may also contribute to theory and/or methodology.
Suggest further directions fore research or make recommendations for policy and/or practice either within the specific organization studied or for the profession.
Appendices: Interview questions, larger excerpts of data, pictures of context for ethnographies, diagrams, other information that makes references in the paper clearer.
VII. works cited.
Pages: 24, double spaced
How Online Game Addiction Affects Relationship
$50.00SUGGESTED OUTLINE FOR THE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REPORT
A research report should convince the reader of the significance, soundness, and thoroughness of the study. It should describe the research questions posed, the conceptual framework used or developed, the foundational literature(s) and related research traditions, the overall approach to the study, the methods of data gathering and analysis, how the researcher ensure the study’s trustworthiness, ways that participants collaborate in the research process, and the tentative conclusions or “lessons learned.” The methods used in the conduct of the study should be described fully, including any interview protocols or observation schedules used. There should be a detailed discussion of the role of the researcher during the conduct of the study as well as the natural history of the inquiry. The conclusions may be presented in any one of a number of ways: thematically, historically/ chronologically, or ideographically, for example. Finally, the report should indicate how the study will contribute to theory, to policy, to practice, and (perhaps) to methodology. The report should be no more than 25-30 pages long and should be carefully proofread for content, organization, logical development, and mechanics.
- Introduction – 1-2 pp.
Summarize the study. Write this section after you have written the others.
- The Research Topic – 3-5 pp.
Describe the problem or topic the study has investigated the research questions are posed and previous research in this area is discussed. (Review of Literature).
Describe the theoretical framework guiding the study, if you are using one. This too may be related to previous research or compared to illustrate the lack of study in this manner or perspective.
Discuss how the study is a specific investigation of a more general phenomenon. Link it to a social science discipline, if appropriate.
Briefly discuss your thinking on the topic. If you are already familiar with it, briefly discuss the research literature on the topic. There is no need to review additional literature for this section. Include what you know or your thinking about the topic.
Discuss why this topic has significance for education (formal or non-formal), pressing social problems, policy issues, the participants, or yourself. Why do we need to learn more about this topic? This is the “so what” question.
- Research Design and Methods – 10-12 pp.
Please note that this section is the most important for the purposes of the course. If it is not thoroughly and competently done, the rest of the paper suffers.
This section details the conduct of the study. Since this is a research course, this section is the place where you demonstrate at lease a rudimentary mastery of the knowledge and skills of the course.
Describe the overall approach to data collection: case study, ethnography, for example. Discuss how the approach emerged, or if you already had it in mind when you began the study. Discuss your design decisions using the methodological literature.
Describe the population of interest. Examples include elementary special needs classrooms, groups of religious women, bereaved mothers, Carnegie schools, cooperative work organizations.
Describe the particular setting or sample of people selected. Discuss your preliminary thinking about the selections, how this changed over time, and what prompted those changes. Discuss what you might go in a subsequent study. Use the methodological literature to discuss your decisions.
Describe the ways you gathered data. Be specific about how often, where, when, with whom; numbers of field notes generated or interviews conducted or observations made, this should also include a discussion of the types of data generated: interview transcriptions, observational records documents, videos filmed, artifacts collected. Discuss the sampling decisions that led you to collect these data rather than some other set. Discuss how the participants collaborated in gathering data, if such was the case.
Describe the processes of data analysis. Theme development, typologies generated, emergent insights. Use of analytic memos, coding schemes, graphic representations of data. Discuss how the participants’ insights were sought and incorporated. Use the methodological literature to discuss your choice of methods and processes of data analysis.
Discuss what you did to try to be sure that the study was well thought-out, ethical, and sturdy, given its small scale. Examples include use of a critical friend, sharing with participants, triangulation of methods or sources. What might you do in a designing a longer-term study?
Discuss your role as you conducted the study. Provide vignettes from your personal journal reflecting emerging insights or crises. Discuss any specific role dilemmas that emerged. Use the methodological literature t discus your points.
Point a natural history of the study. Discuss how your conception of the phenomenon of interest changed over the course of the study; design decisions revised; new twists in data gathering. Try to be comfortable discussing the messiness of inquiry and how the serendipitous can have profound influence on our thinking.
- Findings – 7-9 pp.
Describe the major conclusions or “lessons learned” from the study.
Use categories to organize the data: themes, historical periods, type of individual, critical incidents. No one way is the best; it depends on the data and how you choose to interpret and present them. Develop each category using assertions and then direct quotes or narrative summaries to support each point. This is critical: even though this is a small-scale study and your conclusions are tentative and preliminary, you should convince the reader of their soundness. Build a chain of a logic or evidence ti support the conclusions and interpretations you have come to.
Suggestion: it is better to present and develop fully a portion of the findings (i.e., one category or theme) than to skim over the surface of all the data without development.
- Significance and Implications – 2 pp.
Discuss how the learnings might relate to theoretical ideas or related literature. Restate the specific focus of the study.
Discuss how this small-scale study or a more elaborated study on this topic might contribute to research, policy, and practice; it may also contribute to theory and/or methodology.
Suggest further directions fore research or make recommendations for policy and/or practice either within the specific organization studied or for the profession.
Appendices: Interview questions, larger excerpts of data, pictures of context for ethnographies, diagrams, other information that makes references in the paper clearer.
VII. works cited.
Pages: 24, double spaced
