Showing 118–126 of 727 resultsSorted by latest

• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Reflections on Course Concepts

  $7.00

  Reflections on Course Concepts

  1. Assignment Expectations:
     1. Address concept A and B in about 150 words each.
     2. You will be graded on how well you demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the concept, and critical thinking pertaining to the applicability of the concept to your professional practice. Points awarded will follow breakdown below.

  2. The Assignment:Given the readings and assignments in the course, identify and discuss two concepts or lessons learned that you believe will be most applicable to your professional discipline.
  3. Concept A (points 10/20):
     1. Identify /define (points 4/20): ……
     2. Your professional discipline: ……..
     3. How applicable (points 6/20): ……
  4. Concept B (points 10/20):
     1. Identify /define (points 4/20): ……
     2. Your professional discipline: ……..
     3. How applicable (points 6/20): ……

  ****Please use these two concepts****

  1. The impact of deductibles and co-payments on patients’ health-seeking behavior.
  2. Understanding the major difference between the Medicare Advantage plan and the Medicaid managed care plan.

  My professional discipline is Healthcare Quality.  My job title is Quality Reporting Specialist.  Below is   my job description.

  The Quality Reporting Specialist works under the supervision of the System Director, Quality Outcomes. Coordinates the collection, and submission of quality measures from a variety of sources for external reporting agencies.  Responsible for ensuring that regulatory requirements and deadlines related to quality measures are met. The Quality Reporting Specialist (QRS) is responsible to be the subject matter expert (SME) for Meaningful Use (MU) Electronic Clinical Quality Measures (eCQMs) and work in coordination with internal departments to successfully submit eCQM results to CMS and/or other regulatory agencies and payers. The QRS will continually maintain knowledge of the current and proposed objectives, measures and criteria of the EHR Incentive Program (Meaningful Use) requirements related to eCQMs, and other required quality reporting programs. Also serves as the SME for RHS quality reporting vendor tools, inclusive of providing training and education to the Quality Team and managing access for RHS users. Specific roles and responsibilities are noted below. The Quality Reporting Specialist works collaboratively with corporate and health system team members to ensure that services and supports are delivered within a culture that strives for excellence, continuous improvement and reflects Riverside Health System’s Mission, Vision and Core Values.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Discuss the use of selection tests

  $15.00

  2. Discuss the use of selection tests (anything used to evaluate, including education and experience documents are “tests”) using three examples:
     • a) A front-line junior office assistant in a large organization
     • b) A public safety employee who will have rank
     • c) An agency chief executive officer.

  4 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Identify the civil service framework of protections

  $20.00

  662 Q 1

  1. Recent reform trends in human resource management have focused on compensation, benefits and position management. Identify the civil service framework of protections in each of these three areas followed by the reform critique arguing why each protection should be abolished. Provide contemporary examples.

  5 Pages
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Short Essay/Written Assignment #3 – Week 8

  $20.00

  Short Essay/Written Assignment #3 – Week 8
  Instructions:
  Answer each of the following in approximately 200 words each.

  1. An element of the National Security Act of 1947 stated “…No United States intelligence information may be provided to the United Nations or any organization affiliated with the United Nations…” Briefly defend this position from an ethical perspective.

  2. How would you define “morally intolerable” and “morally acceptable” from an intelligence operation perspective concerning national security? Is torture of terrorists or enemy combatants ever morally acceptable?

  3. Explain what you would consider to be a working definition of integrity for an intelligence gathering government agency. What sort of attributes would be absolutes?

  4. What sort of conclusion did Kent Pekel come to in his discussion of integrity and ethics at the CIA? What are his recommendations?

  5. Under what circumstances would war be a “just” war? The law allows one to act justifiably in defense of self or defense of others. Would war also be allowed in defense of others?
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Alpha Level

  $5.00

  Researchers routinely choose an alpha level of 0.05 for testing their hypotheses. What are some experiments for which you might want a lower alpha level (e.g., 0.01)? What are some situations in which you might accept a higher level (e.g., 0.1)?
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Reflection – “Program Evaluation Procede-Proceed” and “PRECEDE-PROCEED #2”

  $10.00

  Read both “Program Evaluation  Procede-Proceed” and “PRECEDE-PROCEED #2 Devine_2007_Diet,” then write a reflection to “PRECEDE-PROCEED #2 Devine_2007_Diet.”

  Article Chosen – Pizza is Cheaper Than Salad

  Instructions:

  1. You are expected to have read the weeks’ assigned readings prior to class reflections/discussions. PowerPoint copies of each respective lecture will be available in Titanium.
  2. Complete a substantive, comprehensive, and detailed reflection for one of the two assigned weekly supplemental readings posted on Titanium.  There is no minimum required length; however, most exceptional reflections tend to be around 750-1,000 words.  These reflections should demonstrate your detailed understanding of the readings (in your own words), and your ability to critically evaluate them.
     Some of the supplemental articles can be quite challenging to read/comprehend.  I encourage you to not let yourselves be frustrated by this challenge!  I do not expect you to comprehend all of content, so do not spend too much of your time attempting to.  The intent of these articles is to show you how the theories are applied (i.e. put into practice, in real life settings/research).  Therefore, do not focus as much on the tables, graphs, and more difficult research concepts.  Simply focus on the general intent of the article, the theory used, its’ specific constructs, and how they are being utilized in practice.  It is one thing to be able to list and define theory constructs, it is quite another to be able to be able to apply them yourselves.
  3. The primary focus of your supplemental article reflections should be the following: What is the article about?  How are the theory constructs applied (i.e., put into practice)?  How are certain constructs similar to other theory constructs we have covered?  How could the article have been strengthened by utilizing constructs from alternative theories we have covered, in place of those used by the authors?
     Secondarily, you should also address the following (*note, you will be graded heavily on the depth and details of the primary criteria, so the majority of your effort should be focused there; however, the following criteria should also be addressed): What did you find particularly interesting or helpful?  What are your criticisms of the article?  Do you agree or disagree with the author and why?
  4. The role of the reflection is to demonstrate in-depth analysis/synthesis of supplemental readings and course materials; also, for student-to-student engagement as lead by your instructor (where appropriate).  My role is to lead, monitor and grade overall activity.
  5. You should be able to demonstrate exceptional familiarity and synthesis of the readings and topics during the assigned reflections/discussions and activities.  It is a requirement that everyone raises issues, and critically evaluates the application of theories.
  6. Active participation also includes the ability to integrate readings, concepts and experiences, to provide constructive feedback to student colleagues and faculty and to be open to the feedback from others.
  7. At the end of the semester, all of your contributions to the class reflections/discussions and participation will be evaluated with special attention to evidence of critical thinking, and collegiality.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Semiconductors Essay: Ion Implantation and Diffusion Drive-In Paper

  $20.00

  Semiconductors Essay: Ion Implantation and Diffusion Drive-In Paper

  Perform some basic research in Ion Implantation and Diffusion Drive-In (for semicoductors) and document your findings in a maximum of 1000 words. Items to be included:

  – Reason for Ion Implantation being very accurate
  – Typical Mathematical models used and where they are used
  – Ion channelling
  – Annealing Process and typical temperature and atmosphere used.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Exploring Diversity: A Case of Common Centipedes

  $40.00

  In detail, describe an invertebrate anatomical structure, organ or organ system (or related group of structures) in a single species (or group of related species). paper must address the evolution significance for survival of the organism

  Exploring Diversity:  A Case of Common Centipedes

  LENGTH:
  A minimum of 2500 words NOT INCLUDING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
  ➢ Title Page
  ➢ References Page
  ➢ Photos/Diagrams/Illustrations
  ➢ Any Appendices

  REFERENCES:
  A minimum of at least SIX DIFFERENT references (see reference specifics below). You may use more than six references and the expectation is that you will have more than six different sources.

  TOPIC:
  In detail, describe an invertebrate anatomical structure, organ or organ system (or related group of structures) in a single species (or group of related species). Your paper must discuss the function of the structure(s) and the importance of the structure to the evolution of the species (or group of species) and its significance to the survival of the individual animal. Your paper must address the evolution of the structure as it is known or hypothesized to have evolved. The paper may NOT be on a vertebrate animal. This is NOT a general summary review of an invertebrate animal.
• BUY AND DOWNLOAD THE SOLUTION

  Data Analysis and Interpretation Critique (2 documents)

  $40.00

  Read the paper “Management guidelines for women with normal colscopy after low grade cervical abnormalities: population study”, by Teale et al (2000), BMJ, vol 320, pp 1693-1696.

  2(a) the authors describe the study as a “population outcome study”.  Give a brief explanation of the following terms:

  • Observational study, experimental study

  • Prospective sample, retrospective sample

  • Longitudinal study, cross-sectional study

  • Case control study, cohort study

  Additional Files:

  photo2__3_.jpg

  Management-guidelines-for-women-with-normal.pdf