Others
Showing 1–9 of 727 results
-
ARTICLE EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT
$3.50Article Evaluation Assignment Instructions
Purpose: In this assignment, you will apply the skills you learned from Chapter 8 of the textbook, and the course presentation on research. You must review this material before beginning the assignment.
Overview: You will locate, evaluate, and cite an article for a pretend research paper. While you will not need to write an actual paper, you will need to demonstrate your ability to conduct a search on the Jerry Falwell Library website, evaluate an article for quality and credibility, and cite your sources with integrity.
Instructions: In this assignment, you will:
- Choose a topic to research from the options in Step 1.
- Search for and locate an appropriate article for your paper. Your article must be:
- Appropriate for writing a paper on the chosen topic (relevant).
- Written by a credible author.
- Scholarly in nature.
- Current for the field of research—in this instance, no more than 5 years old.
- Objectively written.
- Evaluate your article for quality and credibility.
- Cite your source with integrity.
Follow the steps below and record your responses to each question in the space provided.
Note: Your score for this assignment is based on your accurate evaluation of your chosen article, not on meeting the criteria of the pretend research paper. Do not change articles if you find that yours is deficient on some point. Instead, perform a thorough evaluation of the article selected, as this is the basis for your grade.
Step 1. Obtain a topic:
Mark your chosen topic with an X. The importance of time management as an online student How adult learning theory applies to online learners Academic integrity in online higher education Learning preferences and online students Step 2. Search for and locate a scholarly article that is related to your topic:
Criteria Your Responses Article Search What search terms did you initially use when looking for your article? Criteria Your Responses Article Search (continued) Did you have to alter your search terms to find an article? What search terms did you end up using? Paste the permalink for your article in the box. How does your chosen article relate to your topic? Step 3. Evaluate your article for quality and credibility:
Criteria Your Responses Credible Who is/are the author/s? How is/are the author/s qualified to write this article? (You may need to conduct a Google search to find out more about your author/s.) Is this a credible source? Why or why not? Scholarly What is the name of the publication in which your article was printed? Is the article written in a formal or informal style? Provide an example. Does the article include references to other publications? If so, how many? (This information is often available on the article information page.) Criteria Your Responses Scholarly (continued) Was this article peer-reviewed? How can you tell? (This information is often available on the article information page.) Is this a scholarly article? Why or why not? Current In what year was your article published? Is this a current article? Why is it important that your article for this paper was published within the last 5 years? Objective Does/do the author/s have a bias, or conflict of interest, which might impact his or her/their objectivity? Does/do the author/s consider alternative viewpoints and approach them fairly? Provide an example. Does/do the author/s use objective wording, or is the wording subjective or affected by emotions? Provide examples. Would this be considered an objective source? Why or why not? Our Relationship with Nature
$25.00Our Relationship with Nature and the Battle against Climate Change
Requirement:
Reading “THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING”, You must write an argument in response to Klein’s book, You must agree or disagree with ONE of her major arguments.2. contain a bibliography at the end, which contains at least ten sources, none of them wikipedia entries;
3. all quotes and paraphrasing and the bibliography must be in strictly MLA format;
4. must quote from a minimum of four different sources in addition to quoting frequently from This Changes Everything, and these quotes must be relevant and used as evidence to support your argument;
5. included in your required quotes fromThis Changes Everything,you MUST quote at least two times from PART 3 of the book;
6. must state a clear thesis—which is a conclusion of your argument in that it states your position on your issue/topic—in the introduction
7. must use a variety of types of reasons for supporting your conclusion/thesis, including statistics, research findings, case examples, and authoritative sources; you may also use personal experience and testimony, but those cannot be your only evidence;
8. must conclude with a prescriptive assumption—that is, a closing statement about how the world MUST be in the future.
The Laws of War as Applied to Human Security
$30.00The Laws of War as Applied to Human Security:
A Case Study Analysis of the Protection of Civilians in Pakistan during Internal Conflicts.
Table of Contents
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….…2
Thanks/Dedication……………………………………………………………………………………2
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Overview……………………………………………………………………………….………3
Research Questions and Aims………………………………………………………………….4
Methodology……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5
Literature Review ……………………………………………………………………………6
Overview of the Application of IHL to Internal Conflicts………………………………………..13
Non-International Armed Conflicts: Focus on the Protection of Civilians…………………………………………………………………………………..13
Non-State Armed Groups ………………………..…..15
The Protection of Civilians in the Context of the Internal Conflict in Pakistan………………17
Improving Implementation and Monitoring of International Humanitarian Law………..……20
Role of Government, Judicial Authorities, and International Organisations …………………….20
The Perspective of International Organisations………………………………………..23
Monitoring and Compliance Mechanisms 25
Case Study Analysis – Effects of Internal Conflict on Civilians in NW Pakistan………………28
Historical Overview of Fundamentalism in Pakistan………………………………………..28
The Effects of Conflict on Civilian Welfare in NW Pakistan……………………………….30
Challenges Faced By IDPs in Receiving Aid………………………………………………..35
Recommendations to Increase Civilian Welfare and Protection in NW Pakistan……………36
Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….…..…41
References…………………………………………………………………………………….………44Barriers to Critical Thinking
$5.00HUM 115 Week 2 Barriers to Critical Thinking
Identify two barriers as discussed in this week’s readings that influence YOUR critical thinking (the two barriers you select should influence you DIRECTLY – not just critical thinking, in general).
Include only barriers as listed in Thinking: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Critical and Creative Thought, Ch. 2.
Specifically, these include:
- Enculturation (family, work, religion)
- Self-Concept
- Ego Defenses (denial, projection, rationalization)
- Self-Serving Biases
- Emotional Influences (anger, passion, depression)
- Stress
Write at least 150 words for each barrier, describing them and how you can overcome them. Total word count
will be at least 300 words.Citeyour references (if necessary).
Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.
Critical Thinking Reflection
$5.00HUM 115 Week 5 Critical Thinking Reflection
Write a 500-word paper about how critical thinking can be used in everyday life. Include the following in your paper:
Identify three lessons that you learned from this course.
Describe each of them and explain why they are meaningful to you.
How will each of these lessons apply to your everyday life?
What will you continue to work on as a critical thinker?
What is still a challenge to you as a critical thinker?Format all sources consistent with APA standards. Include an APA title page. Use complete sentences, with correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization.
Use Writepoint or a peer reviewer to edit and recise your paper.
Submit your answers in the Assignment Files tab above.
Points of View: Evolution
$10.00HUM 115 Week 3 Points of View
Instructions
Write a 300- to 350- word response to the following:
• Identify an opinion you possess on one of the following issues:
o Evolution
The death penalty
o The legalization of recreational marijuana
o The legalization of medical marijuana
o Minimum wage debate
o Abortion
o Gun control
o Doctor assisted suicide
o Or another topic you first approve through your instructor
• Research your opinion. Locate one reliable and credible article. Describe why you chose this article and explain how it is reliable and credible.
• Research your opposition. Locate one reliable and credible article. Describe why you chose this article and explain how it is reliable and credible.
• What did the data in each reveal about your opinion? In other words, was it supported or disproved by your findings?
• Has your opinion changed after researching it? Explain your answer.
• What information do you think is needed to formulate an educated opinion on this topic?
Cite your references. Please complete the assignment in APA format, include a reference page, and cite both articles.PLEASE VIEW THIS VIDEO BEFORE BEGINNING THE ASSIGNMENT: http://screencast-o-matic.com/watch/c2h0FVnz7A
Remember, this is not an assignment in which you write a report proving your opinion. It is a review of both sides of the issue and how it affects your views. Thank you!
Solving Personal Problems: Applying the Five-Step Model
$10.00Solving Personal Problems: Applying the Five-Step Model HUM/115 Critical Thinking in Everyday Life
Solving Personal Problems: Applying the Five-Step Model
This assignment contains two parts. You must complete both parts before saving and submitting to the assignment link.Part One: Describing the Five-Step Process
List the five steps in the model for problem solving from Chapter 6 of Critical Thinking in Everyday Life. Write a 25-50 word description of each. COMPLETE SENTENCES. Remember to correct cite and reference any source you use to complete this assignment.
Please note: Only the steps from Chapter 6 can be used for the left side of this worksheetStep (provide name) Description (in your own words)
Step 1: Identify the problem Identifying the problem would be preparing a statement of the problem to help you later find information you may lack or find underlying causes of the main issue.
Step 2: Discover the causes of the problem While discovering the causes of the problem you are looking at the current situation rather then its history. At the beginning you should brainstorm and identify all the possible causes. Some examples of causes would be people, resources, environment, processes, procedures, and rules.
Step 3: Create options to solve the problem (creative thinking) While creating options to solve a problem you should brainstorm solutions. This would be collecting as many ideas as possible, and then screening then to find the best idea. It’s important at this time to not pass any judgment on the ideas, just write them down as you hear them.
Step 4: Evaluate the best options to solve the problem (critical thinking) When evaluating the best option to solve the problem many questions should be asked for the solution you plan to implement such as: which approach is most likely to solve the problem long term? Which approach is the most realistic? What is the extent of risk associated with each alternative? This is the process in problem solving and decision making are integrated.
Step 5: Act, monitor, and modify selected options if necessary In step five, you should be implementing the best alternative (this is your action plan). Then you can monitor the implementation of the plan by looking to see if you’re seeing what you would expect from the indicators. Lastly, you can then verify if the problem has been resolved or not. If not, you can then modify the solution to better accommodate the resolution you are looking for.Week Two Post-Discussion Reaction Form SOC/110 Version 6
$5.00Week Two Post-Discussion Reaction Form SOC/110 Version 6
At the end of your weekly discussions, answer the following questions in 100 to 200 words. Be honest. You will not be graded on any negative responses.
Group Interaction
- How clear was the intent of the discussion?
- How prepared were your group members for the discussion?
- Did everyone participate equally in the discussion?
- Were group members open to different points of view?
- How would you describe the overall climate of the discussion?
- Did you feel your group was productive in the discussion? Did you use the time efficiently?
- What strategies can you use in future discussions to increase productivity and outcomes?
- What approach will you take next time to increase group cohesion?
Video Analysis – “Helping Annie”
- What are the issues in this meeting?
- Can you identify roles and needs in this group?
- What did they do well as a group?
- What is the best course of action moving forward for this group?
- Based on what you learned this week, how might you handle this situation differently?
Running of bulls and Oktoberfest analysis
$20.00PAPER INSTRUCTIONS
For the coursework you are expected to prepare a report based on a detailed analysis of one international issue and its relevance to two international events. In the report you are required to: · Introduction: Introduce your coursework including a brief description of the events and the aims of your coursework. (You can refer to more detail in the appendix) (15%) ·Literature Review: Focusing on the theoretical aspects of the international issue that is to be discussed such as: globalisation; cross cultural exchange; political tension; social media; lifestyle changes/impacts; environmental, cultural, economic, social issues; health and safety issues. You are required to review the published literature on this issue. Your literature review must be based on a variety of academic sources (books/journal articles) (25%) ·
Analyse and Discuss: Provide an analytical discussion of the issue chosen in relation to your chosen events. This should be a critical evaluation of the role, development, operation and management of your chosen international events in light of these issues (40%) ·
Recommendations: Make justified recommendations as to how the planning, organisation and implementation of the events should approach and deal with the international issue in the future. (20%)
It is up to you to identify events but they must be of International stature and hosted outside UK. If you have a doubt about your event, please contact your Module Co-Ordinator.
PS: Football World Cup, Olympic Games, Commonwealth Games, Rugby World Cup, Champions League – SHOULD NOT BE USED
